CHECK NOW for LOWEST PRICES TODAY!!!
Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD and 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Standard Zoom Lens
Eos Canon for BUY & BEST DISCOUNT FOR BLACK FRIDAY DEALS 2011 !!!...
Available at Amazon : Check Price Now!
BEST DEALS Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD and 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Standard Zoom Lens
Eos Canon for BEST DEALS PRICES & REVIEW : BLACK FRIDAY 2011 !!!...
Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD and 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Standard Zoom Lens
Eos Canon
cheapest black friday online discount...
Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD and 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Standard Zoom Lens
Eos Canon
More Choices! More Variety! Selected Just for You......
Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD and 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Standard Zoom Lens
Eos Canon for BLACK FRIDAY DEALS 2011 LOWEST PRICES & BEST PROMOTION !!!
Please Check Update Here!!
Eos Canon
Special for cheapest price black friday's deals and discount
Customer Review :
A seriously capable and enjoyable camera. : Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD and 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Standard Zoom Lens
I think this request is one that most of us ask ourselves when considering a purchase of this magnitude. The request is not an easy one, and I'm not sure I made the literal, decision in purchasing this excellent piece of technology. Let me put it in perspective; I am a prosumer camera user. I love photography and take a range of photographs including family pictures, sports photography (see photos at smugmug for gatorowl), and casual road photography. I have owned lots of cameras including film, digital P&S and Dslrs. The 7D is my sixth Dslr (including a Dreb Xsi that I sold after two weeks). Before the 7D, my main camera was a 40D, which I found to be satisfactory especially the image capability (Iq). The negatives of the 40D are lack of weather sealing, 6.5 frames per second (fps) repeat rate, 1600 Iso max (can be pushed higher) and some focusing issues especially in sports photography. Of course, when comparing with the the Dreb series, these "negatives" immediately come to be positives. The 40D has great construction, much faster repeat rate, and much great focussing (the T1i has, arguably great high Iso capabilities). The 40D compares well with the Nikon D90. Both cameras are very close. The D90 has video, great high Iso performance, and is a exiguous more compact. However, it is a exiguous slower in repeat rate, and I found choosing D90 focus points a bit on the clumsy side. Anyway, because of lens choices, I decided to go Canon. The 50D held no attract in general because it was an incremental improvement. So, I plan my kit was set for at least a join of years.
Notice that in the above discussion, I never talk about Iq. Of all the 10Mp or great Dslrs that I have used, there is no noticeable divergence in Iq. However, after the 7D proclamation and some of the initial reviews, I was convinced that the 7D was a measure correction over the 40D in every respect. I panicked, sold my 40D and bought a 7D.
So, what did I find? The 7D is a great camera and is a clear correction over the 40D. In some respects, it is substantially great than a 40D, but Iq isn't one of those major improvements. If you look at your files at 100%-300%, you will see more detail in a 7D shot. I have a acceptable photo that I take in my office when I get a new lens. I had to blow the photos up to 300% before I could detect differences. There was more texture detail in the 7D and the divergence and saturation were better. However, to be honest, it's not clear how much of this divergence is attributable to the camera or the lenses (I shot the 40D with a Sigma 70-300mm and the 7D with a Canon 70-300mm Is lens). Frankly, I'm not surprised. Dslrs are so good right now, differences in Iq at low Iso are marginal. However, I do feel confident that I can shoot at 1600 Iso or 2000 Iso with the 7D without a mountainous reduction in quality. While I can operate noise at 3200 Iso, color saturation and divergence decline more than I like. With the 40D 800 Iso was as far as I wanted to go, but I would push it to 1000 when desperate. The 7D provides is a major Iso gain.
I easily love the 7D focus system. I don't know if it is as good as the Canon 1D series, but it is so, so much great than the 40D. By focusing on the exact point in a field, I feel like my creative options are substantially expanded. I was often frustrated by having the wrong part of my picture in focus. This need never happen with the 7D.
The 8fps repeat rate is a nice bonus. It just raises the probability that the exact frame you want will be captured.
So, the request is should you upgrade? You have to decide whether you can afford it; so my guidance assume that you can afford the camera, but are finding for the camera that best matches how you shoot.
If this is your first Slr (film or digital):
I'd advise starting with a Canon T1i or Nikon 90D. The 7D is an highly complex camera that will take many hours to learn and dozen of hours shooting to master. Unless you have the time to invest in such a camera it will just be a source of frustration. Unlike approximately every other camera I've owned, the user will obtain disappointing or bad results unless s/he truly understands this equipment. By contrast, you can take other Dslrs and just start shooting. Unlike the other cameras, the 7D has no scene modes. With other Dslrs you can take your time and gradually learn the more sophisticated capabilities. Most importantly, the capability of your pictures will be just as good.
If you are involving up from an entry level Dslr:
You need to ask yourself why you are involving up? If you are dissatisfied with the Iq, then the 7D is not your answer. Using the 7D, it will take a lot more work (initially) to come to be proficient. However, if you need a faster framerate, great high Iso execution (although the T1i and D90 are very good for high Iso), long for a great focussing system, or shoot in the rain or the beach, then the 7D might make sense.
If you are involving up from a mid-level Xxd or Nikon D300:
As before, you're getting very exiguous Iq correction (wildlife photographers claim they can use the extra cropping capability, but I'm not convinced it's substantial). Buy the 7D because the features contribute you with value. Also, I would seriously discourage whatever from switching from a Nikon D300 to a 7D. There has to be an absolute must-have 7D feature for you to make that leap.
As for me, I don't regret this purchase. I'll never say never, but I'm hoping that the 7D will be my last crop-sensor camera. I love the flexibility and expansion of creative options that the new features allow me. It's a spectacular, camera. I'm finding transmit to spending many hours becoming closely acquainted with its capabilities.
Update: December 2010:
I guess one should never say, "never" since I've purchased (and sold) two crop-sensor cameras. Since writing this review, the major camera associates have released several cameras in the crop-sensor arena, so I plan that I'd modernize my review. In terms of best all-around crop-sensor camera, nothing released since the 7D beats Canon's offering. However, the more recent releases are in some cases marginally great than the 7D on confident dimensions.
I'll start with the T2i. It's a great exiguous camera, which is virtually a twin to the T1i but with some updates. whether these updates are important depends on how you shoot. The two biggest improvements that the T2i has is its video and jPeg quality. The T2i has the 7D's 18Mp sensor, so raw image capability should be virtually identical. However, the low-noise, high-Iso jpeg samples I've seen have been truly amazing. Canon has undoubtedly improved the jPeg engine with this camera. Therefore, if you are on a funds and don't want to bother with raw, the T2i or its bigger sister, the 60D, are involving choices. The T2i's video is comparable, if not great than the 7D's, so if you want video that is a nice correction over the T1i, then the T2i is a good choice. The one major T2i flaw is the Af system. It is the same Af theory as old Rebel generations and is clearly inferior to the 7D. The lack of Af flexibility and accuracy on the T1i drove me crazy, so I sold my copy. There were too many missed shots, and I found that it just didn't work well as a backup. I fear that the T2i shares this flaw.
Which brings me to the 60D. Canon has positioned this camera as a replacement for the the 50D, but others have labeled it an upgrade for the Rebel series. I think that both views are correct. Compared to the 50D, the camera has a slightly slower continuous shooting rate, less metal construction, and no micro-lens Af adjustment, but it has video capabilities, a swivel Lcd (great for video but also for taking still shots at odd angles). Compared to the T2i, it is bigger (similar in size to the 50D), has a more solid feel to it, much great Af (similar to the 50D but not as good as the 7d), and much faster continuous shooting. Personally, if I hadn't already purchased the 7D, I would be a 60D customer. It's Iq is similar to the 7D (jpeg, approximately easily better), and the Af is sufficient for my needs.
This brings up the Nikon D7000, which is currently the rave. It is a D90 replacement and adds some nice improvements including weather sealing, much improved Af, 100 Iso (the D90 started at 200), micro-lens Af adjustment, enhanced video, improved Iq, and greater resolution (16Mp). The Iq improvements is the feature that gets the most press. The D7000 most likely offers the best crop-sensor Iq available 2010-11. However, for most purposes, most of us won't consideration the divergence in the middle of pictures taken with comparable capability lenses from any of these camera. Where the D7000 shines is in the capability of noise in shadow and dark areas and in low-light shooting. The D7000 provides a greater capacity to "push" the shadows giving greater dynamic range to those who work in raw. And Iso 3200 shots reserve noticeably more color and dynamic range with less noise than the Canons. While it's noticeable, the divergence may need near pixel-peeper scrutiny to see. While these features are significantly improved, they are still not at the same level as the great full-frame cameras, but it is at a level that makes low-light shooting and dynamic range less of a fancy to consider full frame.
Thus, for whatever with a important investment in Canon lenses, there is no fancy to switch. The 7D is still the best available crop sensor camera for Canon shooters, but the 60D is more than sufficient for whatever who doesn't easily need the 7D's pro-level features. The T2i is great for whatever on a budget, but if you can stretch a bit, I'd advise the 60D. You will be able to grow with it and will find exiguous in it to frustrate you. It is a great all-around camera with very few compromises. E.g., I am yet to micro adjust my 7D for any of my lenses. I'm whether very lucky or not that picky.
For person starting out, the decision is harder. the D7000 is a spectacular, modernize for whatever shooting Nikon's entry-level cameras, but it is not a must-do modernize for D90 users. The D90 is a great camera that still meets my needs and the D7000 improvements are nice but not important unless one is shooting at a pro or semi-pro level. For a new user, the $1199 price is awfully high for a first camera, especially when there are so many good lower-priced alternatives (look elsewhere for reviews of Nikon's entry level offerings). If person is an enthusiast and is trying to decide in the middle of the D7000 and the 7D, I think that the cameras are sufficiently close that the decision should be made based on lenses that you want to use. All in all, this is a great time to purchase a crop-sensor camera.
CHECK LOWEST PRICES , BEST DISCOUNT and COMPARE PARE PRICES ABOUT Canon EOS 7D 18 MP CMOS Digital SLR Camera with 3-inch LCD and 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Standard Zoom Lens
Eos Canon ONLINE SHOPPING...CHECK HERE NOW~~!!!!!
Best Buy Dvd Shelf For Your Home Garden Best 4 Buyexhaust systems car-Automotive